Is this some nightmarish dystopia?
No, this is contemporary Japan.
The Japanese government argues that it must regulate citizens' lifestyles because it is paying their health costs. This highlights one of the greatly underappreciated dangers of "universal healthcare." Any government that attempts to guarantee healthcare must also control its costs. The inevitable next step will be to seek to control citizens' health and their behavior.
The whole article is readable here.Some time ago, Coyoteblog coined the phrase 'health care trojan horse' to illustrate the idea that socialized health care is the gateway to regulating every personal aspect of individual lives.
Once 'society' is responsible for the costs of health care, everything you do becomes justifiable for regulation - eating, drinking, smoking, TV watching, exercising, sex, bicycling, tobogganning, driving... ad infinitum.
No element of your personal life remains beyond the realm of bureaucratic scrutiny.
Let me suggest another phrase that might apply perfectly and offer an immediate solution for free people everywhere: Peaceful Non-Compliance.

4 comments:
So where is your stand on healthcare?? Are you for it or against it? Do you want healthcare (read you and me) to pay for bad health choices or do not want coverage and let the people who make the bad choices pay?
You may have to realize that this issue has no answer that will please a libertarian because you dont want government interference with how fat you wanna be, but yet you may be unwilling to make good health choices and cost us all money to take of you. Or would you rather not have any healthcare and let everyone be responsible for their own medical treatment...Now you may be on to something....this would likely bring the bloated costs down (it wouldn't be popular with the hypochondriacs tho) but then who would regulate the medical profession?
Why should I pay for your healthcare?
Better yet, why should you be FORCED to pay for MY health care? That's a better way to phrase the question.
Using coersion to take by force from one person to pay for the accident/choice/illness of another is simply immoral.
There are many options for a free market to offer inexpensive and highly effective health care on a pay per use basis. That's what a free market would dictate.
Checking waistlines....sounds a little like a professional ballet school that I know of. Very interesting article and thought provoking point of view Rod dy.
I follow your blog for its unintentional humour. Thanks for another laugh!
Post a Comment